If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone. They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby. A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue. However, because http://editortext35.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33973767-how-long-can-you-go-coming-from-a-5g-portable-tower-without-becoming-unsafe?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts. Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. what is a safe distance from a cell tower In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it. While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas. But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems. This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating). This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines. In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
http://editortext35.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33973767-how-long-can-you-go-coming-from-a-5g-portable-tower-without-becoming-unsafe?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog|what is a safe distance from a cell tower
