If http://www.med.alexu.edu.eg/ssc/members/combsave01/activity/1319718/ 've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. safe distance to live from cell phone tower appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone. They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts. Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. safe distance from cell tower for Maximum Exposure In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it. Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas. This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues. This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating). This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards. Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
http://www.med.alexu.edu.eg/ssc/members/combsave01/activity/1319718/|safe distance to live from cell phone tower|safe distance from cell tower
